Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Efevretis's avatar

This is a moving way to mark ten years, and turning that loss into something practical for other families is a generous thing to do.

The point that does the most work here is the one you make about the 40% figure: a hereditary predisposition does not shrink the modifiable share of risk, it raises the stakes on it. That reframing matters, because the family-history conversation so often collapses into surveillance alone, as if genetics sets a fixed ceiling. Holding both at once, the inherited fraction and the part you can act on, is the harder and more honest framing.

Lisa Oliver's avatar

Thank you for this article. I am so sorry for your loss, I have to imagine your mom is so proud of the work you are doing to honor her.

Question for you about genetic testing. As the science and technology evolve is there an argument to be made for re-testing?

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?